How to reduce auto emissions

+ Reply to Thread

Results 1 to 6 of 6

Arizona Automotive Institute
Emission Reduction Solutions
For Immediate Release
September 15, 1997
Arizona Automotive Institute

On September 3, 1997, I took part in a demonstration held at the Arizona Automobile Institute, which was not in any way associated with or endorsing the product being demonstrated. Arizona Automotive Institute was simply being used as a facility for testing.
The demonstration was presented by Mr. Michael Taylor and Mr. Frank Diamond.
The demonstration was to validate that a fuel additive would reduce auto emissions by 80% and improve mileage by 20% or more. Two vehicles were picked by the Institute to be tested.

One was a 1992 Ford Thunderbird, computerized fuel injected.
The second was a 1983 Chevrolet full size Blazer with no computerized controls in the carburetor
system. Both vehicles were mechanically sound and would easily pass emissions by the Arizona State standards.
I felt that both vehicles would put the product to one ultimate test, as their emissions were about as clean as they could possibly be. To my surprise, after disabling the air (air injection reaction) systems, which help clean up the exhaust even further in the catalytic converter, the product worked as advertised.
Hydrocarbons (fuel pollutants called HCs) went from 76 ppm (parts per million) to 2 ppm in the Ford.
The Chevrolet went from 80 ppm to 7 ppm.
Both vehicles produced 0% carbon monoxide (COs),
I believe that this additive if used by federal, state, and local governments as well as companies with large and small vehicle fleets would save large sums of money in fuel costs and drastically reduce emissions.
In my opinion, smog could be drastically reduced at literally no cost to the user because of the increased mileage per gallon benefits.

Gary Varner
Master ASE Technician, Instructor

may i know the product name of that additive? if that really works maybe it will cost a lot. i hope that product would cheaper so that every one could buy that and use. That product is really a big help to our growing "global warming" problem.

Originally Posted by greenranger

may i know the product name of that additive? if that really works maybe it will cost a lot. i hope that product would cheaper so that every one could buy that and use. That product is really a big help to our growing "global warming" problem.

There is one method to reduce the automobile emissions. Its by using Platinum based filter..

Platinum has a tendency to remove harmful gasses. So that will be helpful, but little costly

Similarly chemicals like caustic soda can be used to remove carbon monoxide from exhaust.

Originally Posted by greenranger

may i know the product name of that additive? if that really works maybe it will cost a lot. i hope that product would cheaper so that every one could buy that and use. That product is really a big help to our growing "global warming" problem.

The product for gas is MPG-BOOSTER. High Performance Plus has been blending it since 1987. Information on their products can be found at HighPerformancePlus.com

The problem with fuel additives is that most of them are too weak to work (by design) High Performance Plus's additives are extremely concentrated and save more money in fuel than what they cost. An example is the four-ounce bottle of MPG-BOOSTER. It will treat up to 160 gallons of gas. About ten tanks. At today's gas prices it will save about $45 in gas with a 10% increase in mileage (Guaranteed) But the best part is the huge reduction in emissions. As Gary Varner of The Arizona Automotive Institute said "In My Opinion, Smog Could Be Drastically Reduced At Literally No Cost To The User Because Of The Increased Mileage Per Gallon Benefits"

Thanks,
Bob Marshall
High Performance Plus
602-490-8380

Thats a good way to reduce the automobile emissions, because

It is not only a product to reduce the emission.

It also increases fuel economy. which is most important when any optimization is done to reduce emission.

Will it cost cheap or expensive ?because i thought it is a simple process to do.