Welcome to the Green Forums! Please Register For Free Now!


The Green Forums member base includes well over 3,000 green forums members and 9,000 green forums posts! Be green and join our green community by registering for free today! Registration will give you full access to the Green Forums and takes just a moment to complete.
Please Join Us Right Now!
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Administrator
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Denver &...
    Posts
    5,438

    Default Rules Lacking for Geoengineering Projects for Global Warming

    What if someone wanted to deploy a massive project to try to reverse climate change today? Perhaps some researchers wanted to spray sulfur particles into the stratosphere to reflect away some of the sun's energy, cooling the Earth in an attempt to compensate for global warming. Or perhaps a group wanted to unload some fertilizer into the ocean, so more algae will grow and absorb carbon dioxide ...






    More...

  2. #2
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,378

    Default

    This shows the insane arrogance of commercially motivated science that tries to take control over Nature to squeeze out all the profit it can. But any such injection into the biosphere would be received as just another pollutant joining all the others spewed out every day by growing human industries. Is there such a thing as an environmentally sensitive businessman?

  3. #3
    Val
    Val is offline
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    NW Kansas
    Posts
    1,567
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Chemtrails The facts - YouTube
    Devvy Kidd -- Contrails: Killing us softly?
    GeoEngineering Current Actions | Agriculture Defense Coalition
    The "HOLMESTEAD" - Chemtrails: points to ponder - insider stories?

    Very interesting reading and pictures, including of the devices used, if you peruse enough. The no fly days having a temperature jump of 3*F showed the extent of global warming them and how much the contrails worked to mask AGW rather than reduce fossil fuel use enough to eventually stop AGW. Now it is +5*F and rising. They can't afford to mask it enough anymore.

  4. #4
    Val
    Val is offline
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    NW Kansas
    Posts
    1,567
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Scroll down to this at the last site;

    "11. Why all the secrecy?

    Due to the severity of the situation it is mandatory to maintain public calm for as long as possible. The Earth is dying. Humanity is on the road to extinction - without the Shield mankind will die off with in 20 to 50 years. Most people alive today could live to see this extinction take place. This means that an announcement of the situation we face boils down to telling every man, woman and child on earth that they have no future, they are going to be killed. People would panic. There would be economic collapse, the production and movement of goods would collapse. Millions would die in all cities on earth, riots and violence would reduce civilian centers to rubble within days. Half of the population in dense metropolitan areas would try to leave the cities seeking 'safety' in the rural areas thinking that they would be safe. Those left behind in the cities would be at war with their neighbors, fighting for the remaining supplies. We would be telling the world that the world is coming to an end, and even with the Shield the chances of survival are small.

    UV Summer and Global Warming are the immediate problems we face, there are far greater problems that are raising their ugly heads and will present new problems which in some cases have no viable solutions at this time. Ecologies are collapsing. The extinction rate of species is climbing. The amount of chemical pollutants in the water and soil are fast approaching and in many places has surpassed the earth's ability to heal itself. Crop failure is on the rise, even in the USA the returns on crops are smaller than they were 10 years ago. Even with the advances in genetically altered food crops, we are falling behind in our ability to produce enough to go around. Throughout the 20th century chemical fertilizers and pesticides were used to insure the best yields. Unfortunately many of these have contaminated ground water, killed beneficial insects along with the undesirable insects. These chemicals have gotten into the food chain and are affected other species besides mankind. It is only a matter of years before famine spreads like a cancer throughout the world.

    Clean fresh water is in short supply, in many places well water is non-potable, containing the run off of pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers that have been used on crops and lawns. The water treatment facilities we have are unable to scrub out all of the toxins we have placed in the soil and water supply. Many of the toxins we find build up over time in the body, a long slow poisoning which has been making its presence felt in many areas of the world in the form of cancers, leukemia, sterility, birth defects, learning disorders, immune deficiency problems, etc. These are on the rise, any good researcher can find the records. For decades there was public outcry for the end to pollution. For every small step we made to clean up our production, millions where born who added to the problem. Yes, pollution is down per individual, however there are a couple more billion individuals producing pollution, thus the real numbers have an increase in over all pollution produced. Name a city that does not have problems with smog. You would be hard pressed to find one. Though smog controls on automobiles is higher than ever before, the number of autos on the road has increased thus the amount of smog producing pollutants is higher than ever before. All the clean air acts passed to curb individual factory and auto emissions did not address the production of more factories and more autos. Here an uneasy compromise was made between the need to maintain the economy against the need to maintain the ecology. The ecology lost since it was estimated to be a problem decades from now. The economy was a problem that would have dire effects today."

  5. #5
    Val
    Val is offline
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    NW Kansas
    Posts
    1,567
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Apparently this was written in 2004-5, and the project started experiments at the behest of the late Edward Teller from his last book (1992) in 1997. Like in the "Blind Spot" documentary it is a choice between the economy of now and the collapse of the biosphere in the future. The powers that be choose the economy of now, and the leaders are their puppets, for a large part. As we slide off the top of the hill ever faster toward oil depletion, such programs, that produce a lot of HGHGs themselves, will not be able to be funded. Even now the continuing recession toward depression from overpopulation is evident. So no geo-engineering to mask the real AGW will turn it to CAGW after the corporate powers that be have died after a rich life. John's ecocide is real, and has been for some time.
    To me it is so sad that others couldn't think of future generations first. We did, and few others have, all to no avail. I really thought that we could make a difference by promoting low carbon, one child lifestyles. We didn't know that our son's fate was sealed when he was born. I am so sorry for him and all the kids who will ultimately pay the price for those last years of rich living for the elite (who I believe will never get Heaven, and if there is a Hell, they will be sent there).

Green Forums Thread Information for Rules Lacking for Geoengineering Projects for Global Warming

Users Browsing this ThreadRules Lacking for Geoengineering Projects for Global Warming

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Green Forums Threads

  1. Yes, Reggie, This Is What Global Warming Looks Like
    By Cass in forum Green News | Global Warming Articles | Pollution | Recycling
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-22-2012, 10:12 AM
  2. Global Warming Concern
    By runkaproducts in forum Green News | Global Warming Articles | Pollution | Recycling
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-24-2010, 09:03 AM
  3. Scientists say global warming is continuing (AP)
    By Cass in forum Green News | Global Warming Articles | Pollution | Recycling
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-28-2010, 12:41 PM
  4. Coal-state Democrats oppose global-warming rules (AP)
    By Cass in forum Green News | Global Warming Articles | Pollution | Recycling
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-22-2010, 10:31 PM

Members who have read Rules Lacking for Geoengineering Projects for Global Warming

There are no members to list at the moment.

Green Forums Posting Rules for Rules Lacking for Geoengineering Projects for Global Warming

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Rules Lacking for Geoengineering Projects for Global Warming

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1