Welcome to the Green Forums! Please Register For Free Now!
The Green Forums member base includes well over 3,000 green forums members and 9,000 green forums posts! Be green and join our green community by registering for free today! Registration will give you full access to the Green Forums and takes just a moment to complete.
Please Join Us Right Now!
Virgin America recently announced a 15% increase in fuel efficiency with new jet engines. How does this compare to clean-energy powered high-speed trains?
While I applaud Virgin America and Richard Branson's efforts of reducing aircraft pollution, the airline industry as a whole will remain for decades to come one of the most polluting industries.
So while some people are celebrating a small but futile victory, I can't stop thinking of high-speed trains. Powered by clean electricity from solar and wind, high-speed trains could quickly become very efficient zero-emission people movers.
Your ride to and from the city-center train station will certainly cost you less gasoline (your own or that of an old taxicab) than a ride to the far-away airport.
High speed trains would also bring a lot of green jobs to the US with train cars manufacturing and track construction.
I know some environmentalists don't like the idea because of the environmental impact of the new tracks, but it seems obvious to me that it's a choice between the lesser of two evils.
What are we waiting for? Well, I keep forgetting that while Europe and Asia are leaving us far behind, the Republican House of Representatives still doesn't believe in long-term investments in infrastructure that would keep the US competitive.
More on Virgin America's New Jet Engines.
More On Obama's High-Speed Train Proposal.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)